Well, the biggest information is that hot-backups on slave work. And they work fine. Really fine.
Some more information (with nice graph!):
Well, the biggest information is that hot-backups on slave work. And they work fine. Really fine.
Some more information (with nice graph!):
Question from title sounds weird to you? It's just a ‘rm backup_filename'? Well. I really wish it was so simple in some cases.
One of the servers I'm looking into, there is interesting situation:
On 2nd of February Andrew Dunstan committed his patch (with editing by Tom Lane) that:
Log Message: ----------- Provide for parallel restoration from a custom format archive. Each data and post-data step is run in a separate worker child (a thread on Windows, a child process elsewhere) up to the concurrent number specified by the new pg_restore command-line --multi-thread | -m switch.
Continue reading Waiting for 8.4 – parallel restoration of dumps